home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
112894
/
11289917.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-01-31
|
4KB
|
88 lines
<text id=94TT1649>
<title>
Nov. 28, 1994: Government:Newt's Battle-Ready Armey
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Nov. 28, 1994 Star Trek
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
GOVERNMENT, Page 30
Newt's Battle-Ready Armey
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Kevin Fedarko--Reported by Hilary Hylton/Austin and Suneel Ratan/Washington
</p>
<p> If Dick Armey was little known outside the Capitol until now,
it wasn't because he sugarcoats his message. Invited to the
White House in March 1993 to offer his views on the Administration's
new economic plan, he told Clinton that the plan was dumb and
would sink his presidency. Three months later, the Texas Congressman
called Hillary Clinton a Marxist. He apologized--and then
promised to restrict his Marxist comparisons of the Clintons
to Groucho, not Karl.
</p>
<p> Armey's flair for pit-bull partisanship has catapulted him from
obscurity to the upper ranks of the new Republican regime on
Capitol Hill. Nine years ago, as a freshman Congressman, he
was dismissed by the Almanac of American Politics as "hardly
likely to be a power in the House." Now he stands ready to assume
his job in the next Congress as majority leader and right-hand
man to Newt Gingrich, the future Speaker of the House. That
might not be the sort of influence one would expect from a man
whose pickup truck sports a bumper sticker that reads EAT, SLEEP
AND GO FISHING. But Armey has an appetite for power and a talent
for finding the straightest route to it. In June, before almost
anyone in his right mind would have thought Republican control
of the House was possible, he was writing a memo detailing the
transition plan for his party.
</p>
<p> As the story goes, the 54-year-old former economics professor
entered politics after watching C-Span one night and remarking
to his wife, "Honey, these people sound like a bunch of darn
fools." "Yeah," she replied. "You could do that." After winning
his suburban Dallas district in an upset, he proved her right
by spending his debut months in Washington dramatizing his frugality
by camping on a cot in the House gymnasium. Evicted by then
Speaker Tip O'Neill, he reluctantly retreated to a sofa in his
office and later to a house in Maryland.
</p>
<p> Known for his acid sense of humor, Armey has used his seat in
the House as a duck blind from which to take potshots at the
Administration. His weapon of choice is the rhetorical blunderbuss.
The Clinton presidency is not merely flawed; it is a "train
wreck." The health plan was not simply misguided; it amounted
to a "Dr. Kevorkian prescription." And the Congressional Budget
Office is not just a poor source of economic data; basing conclusions
on its figures is "like relying on the Flintstones for an understanding
of the Stone Age."
</p>
<p> When he is not in attack mode, Armey can be highly productive.
In 1987 he launched a crusade to close obsolete military bases,
an almost hopeless cause in a Congress where everyone defends
home-state pork with a passion. But Armey advocated giving a
bipartisan commission the full authority to do the job. Passage
of this measure altered his reputation as a legislator, proving
that he could listen and persuade. Yet his highest skill lies
in attack by ridicule, usually through the deft use of symbolism.
It was Armey who first unveiled a Byzantine chart of the Clinton
health plan that reduced it to a visual cacaphony of arrows,
boxes and fine print. The image was devastating.
</p>
<p> His future agenda is focused on "building down," as he puts
it. Pet projects include proposals to get rid of farm subsidies
and scrap the Social Security system. Still, there are signs
that he may have softened his edge. "We want to have a happy,
democratic work environment that is welcome for Democrats as
well as Republicans," he said last week. "We'll show ((the Democrats))
our good grace, and their worst fears will not be realized."
But Democrats may wonder: Is that a genuine offering or an appetizing
lure trolled by a crafty angler?
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>